We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.
By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
"He is very technical and thorough in his work, he has excellent advocacy skills at trial and he is always on time with his work on pleadings." Chambers and Partners 2022
"Mathew has a particular eye for detail and does not leave any stone unturned." Legal 500 2022
"He listens to clients, is very good in writing and has a very good rapport. He is very approachable and friendly." "He always delivers." Chambers and Partners 2021
"Mathew is very thorough and leaves no stone unturned. I am therefore confident in recommending clients to Mathew for his assistance in LL&T matters. Mathew also produces detailed advice which considers all options available to a client. As an advocate, he is confident and concise." Legal 500 2021
Mathew is a through-and-through landlord and tenant specialist, with a particular emphasis on social housing. If the matter is of relevance to either a landlord or a tenant, in whatever guise they appear (residential or commercial) or whatever Court or Tribunal in which they find themselves, Mathew will be able to assist.
His primary area of work is social housing with homelessness appeals comprising a very large portion of that work, and a growing judicial review practice on top. He frequently acts for many London boroughs, as well as other social landlords and tenants. He has given – and continues to give – training to solicitors and other professionals throughout the country on landlord and tenant matters, and he has written in the legal press numerous times and contributed recordings to the professional development podcasting service, CPDCast.
Above everything Mathew gives direct, concise, no-nonsense and honest advice that cuts through the irrelevancies and focuses solely on what matters to the client. One solicitor has said that “Mathew has the knack of still seeing the wood despite there being many trees in the way”.
In his spare time Mathew enjoys running, walking his beloved Whippet, Maple, and spending time with family. He is also keenly interested in British and North American history, in particular socio-economic history from the mid-19th Century to the 1980s, and also devours any book related to the Second World War.
Rather than simply list the sort of cases with which he regularly deals, as a general rule if the issue or question relates to the occupation or condition of social housing – from the perspective of either the landlord or the tenant/occupier – Mathew can help. Indeed, prior to the Bar Mathew cut his teeth at a busy Housing Aid centre assisting tenants and mortgagors on the Duty Possession Desk. As such, Mathew’ experience in this field stretches beyond his years of work as a barrister.
A large portion of Mathew’s practice sees him advising on homelessness appeals under the Housing Act 1996, drafting skeleton arguments in respect of them and, of course, appearing in Court on behalf of both local authorities and applicants. Mathew is also accustomed in dealing with the now-frequently raised equality and human right issues in the housing, allocations and homelessness context.
Mathew has written a number of articles for the New Law Journal, Lexis Nexis PSL and Adviser (published by the Citizens Advice Bureau) and has recorded a number of podcasts on behalf of CPDCast. He also instigated and edits 42 Bedford Row’s successful and widely-distributed Housing Law Bulletins, which are often published by the Local Government Lawyer.
Mathew’s experience of landlord and tenant matters reaches well-beyond the social housing sector, whether that landlord or tenant is a residential or a commercial one. He is very experienced in long leasehold matters and regularly appears in the First-Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and has appeared in the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). In this respect he is regularly instructed on issues ranging from lease extension, enfranchisement, Right to Manage and the payability and reasonableness of service charges. He also has a burgeoning TOLATA practice and has recently appeared in a number of multi-day trials.
He is particularly interested in the ever-changing context in which private residential landlords find themselves in respect of both managing and obtaining possession of premises (tenancy deposits, retaliatory eviction, HMOs, etc)
Mathew is also frequently instructed in forfeiture proceedings, whether they stem from breaches of residential or commercial leases, regardless of the nature of the breach. He has considerable experience advising on discreet points in this respect concerning entitlement to forfeit and waiver of the same. His commercial practice has additionally seen him undertake advisory and court work in respect of contested business lease renewals under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
Mathew’s direct and realistic advice is particularly valuable in the commercial context, and he prides himself in this respect on his ability and willingness to assist his solicitors or clients with the progression of the case generally.
Mathew is able to provide specialist, pragmatic and commercially focused advice and representation in all areas of concern to the commercial landlord or tenant. Mathew has particular experience representing both landlords and tenants in cases involving:
He is commercially minded and seeks to achieve the best commercial outcome in every case.
Is it fair to treat the children of secure tenants differently for the purpose of succession depending upon how their deceased parent became the tenant? This, in essence, is the question at the heart of the long-running case of London Borough of Haringey v. Simawi. The question will be answered at trial in October 2018
28th February 2018 Read moreMathew McDermott discusses how relevant, if at all, the questions of hindsight and one’s own understanding of one’s security of tenure are when looking at whether or not accommodation is ‘settled’. To what extent is a tenant’s mistaken but honestly-held understanding of their security of tenure relevant when asking if accommodation is ‘settled’ for the
4th September 2017 Read moreUnder Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, and there shall be no interference with that right unless it is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society. In the context of possession proceedings, the courts have interpreted this as offering a defence to a possession claim if to allow it would be disproportionate in all the circumstances.
18th March 2014 Read moreIf the problem is on land, or started there, then Mathew can help.
Mathew has considerable experience in dealing with environmental matters that relate to property. In particular he is frequently instructed in statutory nuisance prosecutions under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and provides training to solicitors on this subject. He is also regularly instructed in general common law nuisance actions arising out of or concerning property as well as issues concerning the enforcement of housing standards under the scheme introduced by the Housing Act 2004.
He regularly appears in court on these matters, including the Magistrates’ Court, as well as advising – both pre- and post- issue or summons – on how to best resolve things.
Mathew appreciates the urgent nature of this work and is always able to advise in relation to emergency applications and to turn around paperwork quickly.
Mathew is a highly experienced and specialist social housing barrister.
Not only is this an area in which he now specialises, but he also worked for a specialist housing law firm prior to becoming a barrister. He cut his teeth with this busy firm, including working on a very busy court duty scheme. He is therefore experienced in any social housing matter:
His work sees him regularly conducting trials (multi- and fast-track) as well as seeking emergency injunctive relief and committal applications, conducting case management hearings and interim hearings. He is available to draft statements of case and advise on any housing matter whatsoever. Mathew appreciates that in this area of law, more than most, quickly turning around paperwork is essential as is direct, practical advice.
Mathew has, over the years, represented the broad spectrum of housing clients: from large local authorities and housing associations through to tenants and other occupiers. This breadth provides a unique perspective and allows Mathew to cut immediately to the real issue in the case.
He prides himself in offering effective, practical and direct advice.
This training will cover a short, easy to digest introduction to statutory nuisance prosecutions in respect of residential accommodation
23rd June 2021 Read moreWhat to consider (or not) when quantifying Rent Repayment Orders
22nd June 2021 Read moreMathew McDermott discusses a recent case on the service of notices in prosecutions for statutory nuisance under the 1990 Act.
14th June 2021 Read moreIn the latest newsletter from the Housing team at 42 Bedford Row, Mathew McDermott looks at the Supreme Court’s judgment dealing with the approach to affordability under Part VII Housing Act 1996
13th June 2019 Read moreMathew McDermott summarises the key principles in this important area of homelessness litigation.
5th June 2019 Read moreIn this Housing Law Bulletin, Mathew McDermott discusses some key changes that take effect from 1st of October 2018.
27th September 2018 Read moreIs it fair to treat the children of secure tenants differently for the purpose of succession depending upon how their deceased parent became the tenant? This, in essence, is the question at the heart of the long-running case of London Borough of Haringey v. Simawi. The question will be answered at trial in October 2018
28th February 2018 Read moreMathew McDermott discusses how relevant, if at all, the questions of hindsight and one’s own understanding of one’s security of tenure are when looking at whether or not accommodation is ‘settled’. To what extent is a tenant’s mistaken but honestly-held understanding of their security of tenure relevant when asking if accommodation is ‘settled’ for the
4th September 2017 Read moreArticle 14 European Convention on Human Rights and treating private sector tenants differently from secure tenants for the purposes of a local authority’s Part VI housing allocation scheme R (on the application of Osman) v. LB of Harrow [2017] EWHC 274 (Admin) 42 Bedford Row’s Mathew McDermott successfully represented the Defendant in this challenge brought
22nd February 2017 Read moreWelcome to this, the 19th bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com New evidence, settled section 204 appeals and costs LB Croydon v. Lopes [2017] EWHC 33 (QB) It is well known that usually
1st February 2017 Read moreOn 29th June 2016, Desmond Kilcoyne and Matthew McDermott were invited by the London Housing and Regeneration group of Lawyers in Local Government (LLG) to conduct a half-day seminar (headed by Alexander McDowall, a lawyer in Legal Services at the London Borough of Camden) on the radical new housing law being introduced by the Housing
5th July 2016 Read moreWelcome to this, the first bulletin of what will be a regular updating service on all issues relating to housing law — whether social or private, landlord or tenant. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com “Can a
4th March 2015 Read moreMathew’s specialist practice focuses exclusively on all matters relating to and concerning landlords and tenants, whether the setting is residential or commercial.
If there is a landlord or a tenant involved in some form or another Mathew can help.
He has considerable experience at the Bar – and at a specialist housing firm before that – in dealing with any landlord and tenant matter: issues of occupation, of possession, of a property’s condition, disputes over leases (of any nature), rents, succession, assignments, sub-tenancies, nuisance and environmental protection and discrimination and human rights in the landlord and tenant context.
Mathew has a particular interest in, and experience of, anti-social behaviour and the ever-changing attempts at dealing with it. He has dealt with many cases of serious violence, as well as cases involving the supply of Class A drugs and prolonged and sustained campaigns of harassment. Mathew is also experienced at dealing with anti-social behaviour generally, beyond the housing context.
For years he has been giving lectures and seminars in London and beyond to solicitors on developments in the law relating to landlords and tenants (ranging from procedural changes, human rights, disrepair, deposit disputes, anti-social behaviour and more), as well as having recorded numerous podcasts for the well-known CPD-provider CPDcast and published in the legal press.
Mathew is a specialist landlord and tenant barrister.
If the matter is of concern to a landlord or a tenant, whether the residential lease is a short one or a long one, Mathew can help. From forfeiture claims, service charge disputes and section 21 possession proceedings right through to lengthy and complex cases of unlawful eviction, fraud, harassment and disrepair, Mathew is able to provide effective advocacy in court and direct but practical advice out of court.
Mathew practices in the county courts and the high court, as well as in the First Tier Tribunal (“FTT”), where his cases have involved lease extension, enfranchisement, costs, right to manage and many service charge disputes. Mathew is able to draft statements of case for use at the FTT as well as advice on any matter relating to the FTT’s jurisdiction.
Mathew has a particular interest in, and experience of, tenancy deposit disputes and has published in the legal press on this subject as well as having recorded podcasts for the CPD-provider, CPDCast.
For some years, Mathew has provided training to solicitors on residential landlord and tenant matters. Training has included tenancy deposit changes, the employment of the section 21 procedure, disrepair and procedural issues. Mathew is available to provide training to solicitors and other legal professionals, and the clerks would be happy receive enquiries in this regard.
He is an experienced landlord and tenant barrister having worked for some years across the residential spectrum.
Mathew is always very well prepared, extremely helpful, professional and empathises with the witnesses. He is very personable, down to earth and gets on well with the client. We are very pleased with his work
Mathew provides bespoke CPD-accredited training seminars in all matters of concern to landlords and tenants, either in the residential or commercial sector. These seminars can be held in chambers or at solicitors’ offices. If you are interested in discussing what is available, please contact chambers.
This training will cover a short, easy to digest introduction to statutory nuisance prosecutions in respect of residential accommodation
23rd June 2021 Read moreWhat to consider (or not) when quantifying Rent Repayment Orders
22nd June 2021 Read moreMathew McDermott discusses a recent case on the service of notices in prosecutions for statutory nuisance under the 1990 Act.
14th June 2021 Read moreIn the latest newsletter from the Housing team at 42 Bedford Row, Mathew McDermott looks at the Supreme Court’s judgment dealing with the approach to affordability under Part VII Housing Act 1996
13th June 2019 Read moreMathew McDermott summarises the key principles in this important area of homelessness litigation.
5th June 2019 Read moreIn this Housing Law Bulletin, Mathew McDermott discusses some key changes that take effect from 1st of October 2018.
27th September 2018 Read moreIs it fair to treat the children of secure tenants differently for the purpose of succession depending upon how their deceased parent became the tenant? This, in essence, is the question at the heart of the long-running case of London Borough of Haringey v. Simawi. The question will be answered at trial in October 2018
28th February 2018 Read moreMathew McDermott discusses how relevant, if at all, the questions of hindsight and one’s own understanding of one’s security of tenure are when looking at whether or not accommodation is ‘settled’. To what extent is a tenant’s mistaken but honestly-held understanding of their security of tenure relevant when asking if accommodation is ‘settled’ for the
4th September 2017 Read moreArticle 14 European Convention on Human Rights and treating private sector tenants differently from secure tenants for the purposes of a local authority’s Part VI housing allocation scheme R (on the application of Osman) v. LB of Harrow [2017] EWHC 274 (Admin) 42 Bedford Row’s Mathew McDermott successfully represented the Defendant in this challenge brought
22nd February 2017 Read moreWelcome to this, the 19th bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com New evidence, settled section 204 appeals and costs LB Croydon v. Lopes [2017] EWHC 33 (QB) It is well known that usually
1st February 2017 Read moreOn 29th June 2016, Desmond Kilcoyne and Matthew McDermott were invited by the London Housing and Regeneration group of Lawyers in Local Government (LLG) to conduct a half-day seminar (headed by Alexander McDowall, a lawyer in Legal Services at the London Borough of Camden) on the radical new housing law being introduced by the Housing
5th July 2016 Read moreWelcome to this, the first bulletin of what will be a regular updating service on all issues relating to housing law — whether social or private, landlord or tenant. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com “Can a
4th March 2015 Read moreUnder Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, and there shall be no interference with that right unless it is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society. In the context of possession proceedings, the courts have interpreted this as offering a defence to a possession claim if to allow it would be disproportionate in all the circumstances.
18th March 2014 Read more
